Re: Extended Backus Naur Form (EBNF) Notation
From: Corey Murtagh (emonk_at_slingshot.no.uce)
Date: 06/03/04
- Next message: CBFalconer: "Re: The Year 2038 Problem"
- Previous message: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: VB .NET OOP"
- In reply to: Thad Smith: "Re: Extended Backus Naur Form (EBNF) Notation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 23:32:18 +1200
Thad Smith wrote:
> Steve wrote:
>
>>I would be grateful for anyone wanting to volunteer to proof read it for
>> technical accuracy or any other problems they may notice.
>
> This may seem like a nit, but a font size of 1 is difficult for me to
> read. I recommend using the default font size for standard text.
> Making it smaller to fit on one page is, in my book, false economy if it
> is not easy to read online. Perhaps a second page, optimized for
> printing a crib ***, could use a smaller font. You could also reduce
> the extra vertical spacing to optimize the information on a single page.
Uh... you /do/ know that Mozilla lets you change the base font size on a
web page, don't you Thad? It's in the View menu under Text Zoom.
-- Corey Murtagh The Electric Monk "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur!"
- Next message: CBFalconer: "Re: The Year 2038 Problem"
- Previous message: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: VB .NET OOP"
- In reply to: Thad Smith: "Re: Extended Backus Naur Form (EBNF) Notation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]