Re: VB .NET OOP

From: Programmer Dude (Chris_at_Sonnack.com)
Date: 06/08/04

  • Next message: Programmer Dude: "Re: SoA Vs OO" 
    Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:23:06 -0500

    [Last one of the night. Still nothing here to see...]

    Edward G. Nilges writes:

    >ed> calc.result is not producing a value. As a method, it must
    >ed> be a subroutine and not a function.
    >>
    >>>> Or perhaps it's a property.
    >>>
    >>> It would compile if it were a property,...
    >>
    >> In VB6, anyway, if the method is a Sub, it won't compile, and the
    >> error is "Expected Function or Variable". Has this also changed
    >> in VB.Net?
    >
    > No

    So, my point is, Ed, that it being a subroutine wasn't possible
    from the information provided by the OP. You missed the Decimal
    declaration, and you misdiagnosed the error. Pretty bad gaff
    for a VB.Net programmer. My error kinda pales next to that!

    > My name isn't Eddie. It's Edward, and common courtesy demands you
    > respect this.

    You lost my respect a long time ago. Until/unless you earn it back,
    I'll call you what it pleases me to call you.

    > The ONLY reason I have highlighted this error is your previous
    > conduct. You wasted my time and that of other readers of this
    > newsgroup by first ingenuously demanding code in 2002, and then
    > "criticizing" bugs that were fixed prior to your critique...

    Once again I remind you this is a bald *lie*. You are either
    deliberately trolling or are mentally ill or are an idiot. I
    don't see any other options given the evidence exists for all
    the world to see.

    I guess I will have to dig out that recent review now.

    > ...and stylistic practices with which you were unfamiliar
    > because of lack of experience.

    It was my experience that showed your "style" was crap. Everyone
    here thought so, too. Lotta experienced working programmers
    agreed your code style was crap. I'm sure that hurt your feelings,
    but it's a shame the idea never penetrates that, "Hey, you know,
    MAYBE they have a point...."

    See, Ed, maybe the problem is you don't get out enough. If you
    interacted appropriately with other experienced programmers,
    you'd surely learn just how far off the beam you really are.

    > Furthermore, the fact you post under two ids is meant to
    > further abuse this ng to try to inflate a small working set
    > of true trolls into an apparent large coalition, and it is
    > transparent.

    Your sheer ignorance is astounding. I dropped the deliberately
    transparent moniker, Programmer Dude, because during my job
    search I was interacting with professionals in many ways...
    including my personal email. A moniker didn't seem appropriate.
    Now that the search is off (and Agent is more flexibly configured
    in that regard), PD is back.

    Only an ignorant fool would conceive any attempt to deceive
    on my part. The true email was always present, and the .sig
    makes quite clear (sans even any anti-spammage obfuscation)
    who I am.

    >> You're about the only one around here I disrespect. (But to make
    >> up for it, I'll disrespect you "a whole elephant full!")
    >
    > That may very well be because others here are police agents and
    > retirees with anger management issues,..

    You wanna think so I'm sure, but it's my head, and I'll tell you
    that it's strictly because you're one of the biggest jackasses
    I've met on the 'net.

    You're a rat at the dump, Eddie, and I have a target pistol I just
    love to shoot. You come into my sights, I just have to pull the
    trigger. (-:

    BANG 

    -- 
|_ CJSonnack <Chris@Sonnack.com> _____________| How's my programming? |
|_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL  |
|_____________________________________________|_______________________|
  • Next message: Programmer Dude: "Re: SoA Vs OO"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Linux / Windows GUI application with assembly
      ... consumes 99% of the computing power and a programmer gets the task to ... programmer, he will look what this subroutine does, take the processor ...
      (alt.lang.asm)
    • RE: [Full-Disclosure] Coding securely, was Linux (in)security
      ... that is not what I'm saying. ... What I'm saying is that the programmer ... should not *expect* the subroutine to do his error checking for him. ... The problem we have now is everyone is expecting someone *else* to do the ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: [Subroutine Optimization] Shift vs. @_
      ... parameters passed to a subroutine and when it is appropriate to just ... Whatever makes the most sense to the programmer in the given ... benchmark; but run-time efficiency ... sense, you'll spend less time writing it, and your maintenance ...
      (perl.beginners)
    • Re: question about negative indices in fortran 77
      ... > Intel compilers for linux), but now I'm doing some modifications and I ... declaration as something that looked too strange. ... take revenge on the original programmer. ... > subroutine where it isn't touched. ...
      (comp.lang.fortran)