Re: Aspiring highest-order programmer
From: Tomasz Zielonka (t.zielonka_at_zodiac.mimuw.edu.pl)
Date: 06/12/04
- Next message: Joe Wright: "Re: Aspiring highest-order programmer"
- Previous message: Fantius: "Re: Need comments and ideas about an hypothetic project"
- In reply to: Ian Woods: "Re: Aspiring highest-order programmer"
- Next in thread: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: Aspiring highest-order programmer"
- Reply: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: Aspiring highest-order programmer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:44:00 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Woods wrote:
>
> For NP, it means that there is no known polynomial time algorithm to
> solve the problem.
Last time I checked NP was a superset of P.
Best regards,
Tom
-- .signature: Too many levels of symbolic links
- Next message: Joe Wright: "Re: Aspiring highest-order programmer"
- Previous message: Fantius: "Re: Need comments and ideas about an hypothetic project"
- In reply to: Ian Woods: "Re: Aspiring highest-order programmer"
- Next in thread: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: Aspiring highest-order programmer"
- Reply: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: Aspiring highest-order programmer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]