Re: Chris Sonnack on VB.Net's putative Set statement
From: Randy Howard (randyhoward_at_FOOverizonBAR.net)
Date: 06/16/04
- Next message: Esther Schindler: "Re: How have code analysis tools changed the way you work?"
- Previous message: Randy Howard: "Re: Programming "efficiently" on given hardware - what does it mean really?"
- In reply to: Programmer Dude: "Re: Chris Sonnack on VB.Net's putative Set statement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:01:45 GMT
In article <rs0tc05dp21glrl8o58fahguf4kov7vt5k@4ax.com>, Chris@Sonnack.com
says...
> Edward G. Nilges writes:
>
> > I found and fixed the problem in the code the same evening it
> > was posted without your assistance.
>
> A lie. A bald-faced lie. Which we now expose (again).
> Ed, Your Own Words Name You Liar!
Before I finished reading this all the way through and prior
to reading the Nilgewater "response" to it, I predicted that
he would prevaricate and avoid the truth.
As has been pointed out to him (perhaps a mistake to tell him),
this is why he is so reviled in this group. He calls you a liar
for telling the truth, then ducks the truth when you hit him in
the face with it. He seems to think that newsgroup archives
do not exist. No other explanation, apart from complete stupidity
could explain such behavior.
-- Randy Howard 2reply remove FOOBAR "I admit that it is probably too much work ... to wade through my prose to get to anything useful." -- Edward G. Nilges
- Next message: Esther Schindler: "Re: How have code analysis tools changed the way you work?"
- Previous message: Randy Howard: "Re: Programming "efficiently" on given hardware - what does it mean really?"
- In reply to: Programmer Dude: "Re: Chris Sonnack on VB.Net's putative Set statement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|