Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management
From: Gerry Quinn (gerryq_at_DELETETHISindigo.ie)
Date: 07/23/04
- Next message: Gerry Quinn: "Re: The Decline of C/C++, the rise of X"
- Previous message: db_happy: "Find dynamically class names"
- In reply to: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Next in thread: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Reply: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:18:16 +0100
In article <WaKdneXN0JpV953cRVn-jA@wideopenwest.com>, tgagne@wide-open-
west.com says...
>
> I must live in a vacuum. I can't imagine how one of my methods would be
> passed an object that wasn't intended in production. Probably because the
> code that calls the method was also in testing? Objects don't accidentally
> appear in the wrong places. Cat's don't accidentally show up in collections
> of Dog objects unless put there deliberately.
No bug appears unless put there 'deliberately', in some sense. Unless,
as you say, you live in a vacuum.
- Gerry Quinn
- Next message: Gerry Quinn: "Re: The Decline of C/C++, the rise of X"
- Previous message: db_happy: "Find dynamically class names"
- In reply to: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Next in thread: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Reply: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
