Re: [Q] Text vs Binary Files
From: Donald Roby (droby_at_acm.org)
Date: 08/28/04
- Previous message: Nick Smallbone: "Re: c++ becoming outdated? c# the next 'in' thing?"
- Next in thread: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: [Q] Text vs Binary Files"
- Reply: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: [Q] Text vs Binary Files"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:49:02 GMT
On Fri, 28 May 2004 10:05:35 -0400, Arthur J. O'Dwyer wrote:
>
> *Again* I urge the consultation of the RFCs defining any standard
> binary file format, and the notice of the complete lack of regard
> for big-endian/little-endian/19-bit-int/37-bit-int issues. At the
> byte level, these things simply never come up.
>
>
Try (for example) RFC 1314.
These things certainly do come up, and they're handled by encoding the
rules in a header of the format.
- Previous message: Nick Smallbone: "Re: c++ becoming outdated? c# the next 'in' thing?"
- Next in thread: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: [Q] Text vs Binary Files"
- Reply: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: [Q] Text vs Binary Files"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]