Re: [EGN] Variable hoisting
From: Corey Murtagh (emonk_at_slingshot.no.uce)
Date: 09/10/04
- Next message: Matthew: "Qt 3 C++ Programming - very new - compilation problem -?"
- Previous message: Dave Harris: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing"
- In reply to: Programmer Dude: "Re: [EGN] Variable hoisting"
- Next in thread: Randy Howard: "Re: [EGN] Variable hoisting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 07:55:09 +1200
Programmer Dude wrote:
<snip>
> In particular, viewers might find Ed's original (nilges_original.c)
> interesting to compare to the full re-write (nilges_rewrite.c). If
> you were a maintance programmer, which version would YOU prefer???
I'd prefer eddies, because it'd keep me in work for longer :>
Seriously though, I'd probably recode it similarly.
-- Corey Murtagh The Electric Monk "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur!"
- Next message: Matthew: "Qt 3 C++ Programming - very new - compilation problem -?"
- Previous message: Dave Harris: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing"
- In reply to: Programmer Dude: "Re: [EGN] Variable hoisting"
- Next in thread: Randy Howard: "Re: [EGN] Variable hoisting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]