Re: C to Java Byte Code
From: Galga (none_at_none.spamblowz)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Galga: "Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Previous message: Gerry Quinn: "Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- In reply to: Richard Herring: "Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Next in thread: Richard Herring: "Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Reply: Richard Herring: "Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:32:06 -0700
Richard Herring wrote:
> In message <10ntsg1o8vbi16f@corp.supernews.com>, Paul Lutus
> <nospam@nosite.zzz> writes
>> Mark McIntyre wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:36:02 -0700, in comp.lang.c , Paul Lutus
>>> <nospam@nosite.zzz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, it is a union in C, but I am saying it is not a union in the
>>>> Java bytecode.
>>>
>>> Marvellous. Since this has nothing to do with C any more,
>>
>> Do you see a reference to C in the sentence above? No? Is there an
>> optometrist available in your neighborhood?
>>
>> The discussion is about a C to Java cross-compiler. Both languages
>> are therefore topical.
>
> Not in comp.lang.c++, they are not. Please take this elsewhere.
>
> --
> Richard Herring
Richard, is it going to warp the the fecking space time continuum to get
off your high horse about a topic that is just maybe mere ounces off
topic?
In case you haven't noticed, C and even Java are related languages; many
who use one use or have experience with the others, and who are you to
speak for everyone in c.l.c++, when it might be of interest of people
there? Actually many people I've seen post there have taken interest in
this thread, so I think you are proven wrong just by that.
If you don't like a thread, then kill it on your end, please don't try
to push your tastes on other people; even though this thread may not be
100% topical, but it still can have a place in any of the groups listed.
In fact, this was the entire point of cross posted, as par a gigantic
thread a couple years ago about cross posting; ultimately it's to bring
people of similar interests together, and this topic is just that and
has DONE just that.
So again, kindly kill file this thread if you don't want to see it.
~Galga
- Next message: Galga: "Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Previous message: Gerry Quinn: "Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- In reply to: Richard Herring: "Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Next in thread: Richard Herring: "Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Reply: Richard Herring: "Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|