Re: C to Java Byte Code

From: Richard Herring (junk_at_[127.0.0.1)
Date: 10/27/04 

Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:20:10 +0100

In message <cloijm$b7b$1@news.astound.net>, Galga <none@none.spamblowz>
writes
>Richard Herring wrote:
>> In message <10ntsg1o8vbi16f@corp.supernews.com>, Paul Lutus
>> <nospam@nosite.zzz> writes
>>> Mark McIntyre wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:36:02 -0700, in comp.lang.c , Paul Lutus
>>>> <nospam@nosite.zzz> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it is a union in C, but I am saying it is not a union in the
>>>>> Java bytecode.
>>>>
>>>> Marvellous. Since this has nothing to do with C any more,
>>>
>>> Do you see a reference to C in the sentence above? No? Is there an
>>> optometrist available in your neighborhood?
>>>
>>> The discussion is about a C to Java cross-compiler. Both languages
>>> are therefore topical.
>>
>> Not in comp.lang.c++, they are not. Please take this elsewhere.
>>
>Richard, is it going to warp the the fecking space time continuum to get
>off your high horse about a topic that is just maybe mere ounces off
>topic?

Why is it so important to you to continue crossposting this thread?
What's your agenda? I
>
>In case you haven't noticed, C and even Java are related languages; many
>who use one use or have experience with the others,

In case _you_ haven't noticed, C and C++ are even more closely related
languages, yet comp.lang.c and comp.lang.c++ are separate groups and
there are good reasons for that.

>and who are you to
>speak for everyone in c.l.c++,

Where did I claim to do that?

>when it might be of interest of people
>there?

"Might be"? Have you actually read this group before today?

>Actually many people I've seen post there have taken interest in
>this thread,

Yeah, right. Name five. Then show that they aren't reading it in one of
the other groups where it might be on topic.

>so I think you are proven wrong just by that.

Logic failure. Even *I* take an interest in some off-topic threads. That
doesn't bring them back on topic.
>
>If you don't like a thread, then kill it on your end, please don't try
>to push your tastes on other people; even though this thread may not be
>100% topical, but it still can have a place in any of the groups listed.

So why don't we just add misc.misc to the Newsgroup: line?
>
>In fact, this was the entire point of cross posted, as par a gigantic
>thread a couple years ago about cross posting; ultimately it's to bring
>people of similar interests together,

And what exactly is the "similar interest" in this case? Feel free to
point out which features of the standard C++ language

> and this topic is just that and
>has DONE just that.

In your opinion, perhaps.
>
>So again, kindly kill file this thread if you don't want to see it. 

-- 
Richard Herring

Relevant Pages

  • Re: C to Java Byte Code
    ... >off your high horse about a topic that is just maybe mere ounces off ... C and even Java are related languages; ... kindly kill file this thread if you don't want to see it. ... Richard Herring ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: C to Java Byte Code
    ... >off your high horse about a topic that is just maybe mere ounces off ... C and even Java are related languages; ... kindly kill file this thread if you don't want to see it. ... Richard Herring ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: C to Java Byte Code
    ... >off your high horse about a topic that is just maybe mere ounces off ... C and even Java are related languages; ... kindly kill file this thread if you don't want to see it. ... Richard Herring ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: !!Re: More Phaistos Disk
    ... In message, Jacques Guy ... >phonemic language. ... As for written languages... ... what are you doing here masquerading as Richard Herring? ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: C to Java Byte Code
    ... Richard Herring wrote: ... Who the hell is holding a gun to your head making you read this thread? ... The original post was not a direct C post, nor was it a direct Java ... kindly kill file this thread if you don't want to see it. ...
    (comp.programming)