Re: Not STD C is "not C" ? ----WAS: Re: C to Java Byte Code
From: Programmer Dude (Chris_at_Sonnack.com)
Date: 11/02/04
- Next message: Thad Smith: "Re: Contract Bidding Question, PLEASE assist"
- Previous message: Michael Jørgensen: "uRe: implementing the quadratic sieve"
- Maybe in reply to: Alfred Z. Newmane: "Re: Not STD C is "not C" ? ----WAS: Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Next in thread: Crom: "Re: Not STD C is "not C" ? ----WAS: Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Reply: Crom: "Re: Not STD C is "not C" ? ----WAS: Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Reply: Alfred Z. Newmane: "Re: Not STD C is "not C" ? ----WAS: Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:58:11 -0600
Thomas G. Marshall writes:
> 1. OE is enormously common.
> 2. More and more OE folks are using OE_QuoteFix
> 3. OE_QuoteFix does not regard {space}{reply marker}
> as part of a reply.
>
> So you're going to be dedicatedly producing posts that are hard
> to reply to for a rather large number of people.
TS. There is a common sense among the cognoscenti that folks who
use OE get exactly what they deserve.
An even more common sense is that it's absurd to modify ones own
behavior for arguably defective software used by others.
- Next message: Thad Smith: "Re: Contract Bidding Question, PLEASE assist"
- Previous message: Michael Jørgensen: "uRe: implementing the quadratic sieve"
- Maybe in reply to: Alfred Z. Newmane: "Re: Not STD C is "not C" ? ----WAS: Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Next in thread: Crom: "Re: Not STD C is "not C" ? ----WAS: Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Reply: Crom: "Re: Not STD C is "not C" ? ----WAS: Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Reply: Alfred Z. Newmane: "Re: Not STD C is "not C" ? ----WAS: Re: C to Java Byte Code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|