Re: A case for HTML as a programming language
From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer (ajo_at_nospam.andrew.cmu.edu)
Date: 11/10/04
- Previous message: bazad: "Re: Recommended books on Top Down Design"
- In reply to: Programmer Dude: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Next in thread: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Reply: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:20:24 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Programmer Dude wrote:
>
> Michael Mendelsohn writes:
[Bill Godfrey, I'm fairly sure, wrote:]
>>> Here's one, you'll find the file between the BEGIN and END markers.
>>>
>>> BEGIN
>>> END
>>
>> The validator.w3.org does not consider the empty file valid HTML.
>
> Rightfully so. TITLE is required. I think this should fix it....
>
> BEGIN
> <title>Bill's Program</title>
> END
Now it doesn't output its own source code anymore. Also, I highly
suspect that not only is <title> NOT required, it's actually invalid
to put the <title> tag outside a <head> section, and it's invalid to
put <head> outside an <html> section.
-Arthur
- Previous message: bazad: "Re: Recommended books on Top Down Design"
- In reply to: Programmer Dude: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Next in thread: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Reply: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|