Re: Recommended books on Top Down Design
From: Tomasz Zielonka (tomasz.zielonka_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/10/04
- Next message: Robert Wessel: "Re: Directx mouse"
- Previous message: Thad Smith: "Re: Interesting coding idea"
- In reply to: Phlip: "Re: Recommended books on Top Down Design"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:41:19 +0000 (UTC)
Phlip wrote:
> Curiously, the big software vendors keep pushing statically typed languages,
> Java & C#, while high-level code, such as GUI code or business-logic code,
> typically must bend over backwards to provide dynamic typing. Free and
> powerful languages, such as Ruby, supported entirely by their own programmer
> communities, are going to teach these big software vendors a thing or to.
Isn't it just that those mainstream statically typed languages have
weak, inflexible, crappy type systems (Java, C#) or too complex, weakly
supported and still inflexible type systems (C++)?
Have you considered a language with more powerful, but still
understandable and simple type system, like Haskell?
Maybe you could provide some concrete example for this need of dynamic
typing?
Best regards,
Tom
-- .signature: Too many levels of symbolic links
- Next message: Robert Wessel: "Re: Directx mouse"
- Previous message: Thad Smith: "Re: Interesting coding idea"
- In reply to: Phlip: "Re: Recommended books on Top Down Design"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|