Re: A case for HTML as a programming language
From: Michael Mendelsohn (keine.Werbung.1300_at_msgid.michael.mendelsohn.de)
Date: 11/10/04
- Next message: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Previous message: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Mendelsohn: "A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Next in thread: Casey Hawthorne: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:29:37 +0100
"Thomas G. Marshall" schrieb:
> Arthur J. O'Dwyer coughed up:
> > Ah, but a Turing machine without an infinite tape is not a Turing
> > machine! So you mean "If we are talking about finite state machines,"
> > and you already said that. ;)
>
> I've always viewed this as a silly detail (sorry). If we live no longer
> than 150 years, then we merely need long enough tapes to last 150 years.
> Who cares what states there are beyond that, or if they even exist?
You will be the sole culprit for the infamous Y2.15K problem!
Michael
--
Still an attentive ear he lent Her speech hath caused this pain
But could not fathom what she meant Easier I count it to explain
She was not deep, nor eloquent. The jargon of the howling main
-- from Lewis Carroll: The Three Usenet Trolls
- Next message: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Previous message: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Mendelsohn: "A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Next in thread: Casey Hawthorne: "Re: A case for HTML as a programming language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|