Re: loop test

bolshoyhuy_at_hotmail.com
Date: 12/23/04 

Date: 23 Dec 2004 08:13:52 -0800

"looptest 1000000000
Time to do 1000000000 iterations: 0.000000 seconds.

$ looptest 4294967295
Time to do 4294967295 iterations: 0.000000 seconds.

Pretty much what I expected."

how is it possible to have 0.00 secs for your loops when every else
gets 2,3,5 secs for 10m?
something aint kosher here.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: loop test
    ... >>Maybe if you supply source code in a common programming language ... $ looptest 1000000 ... Time to do 10000000 iterations: ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: Seen java -server optimization vary 50%?
    ... >> I time and print this every hundred iterations. ... >> kill it and start it over the time can be substantially ... >whose most frequently executed loops do a lot of accesses to ... >for an explanation of some important indexing approaches. ...
    (comp.lang.java.help)
  • Re: Analyzing loops with polyhedra libraries
    ... The number of iterations is the number of integer points inside a ... polytope, computed using Ehrhart polynomials: ... you should consider static control loops. ... With "idea" I meant the approach of implementing a loop analyzer ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: VB slows down
    ... Probably not unless this is running on a very slow computer. ... said in your first post that it should end ... up with about 96,000 iterations. ... this by removing all the code from within the body of your loops ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: flatten a level one list
    ... 1000 loops, best of 3: ... Peter ...
    (comp.lang.python)