Re: loop test
From: infobahn (infobahn_at_btinternet.com)
Date: 12/23/04
- Next message: Thomas Matthews: "Re: Areas of Programming..."
- Previous message: bolshoyhuy_at_hotmail.com: "Re: loop test"
- In reply to: bolshoyhuy_at_hotmail.com: "Re: loop test"
- Next in thread: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: loop test"
- Reply: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: loop test"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:05:36 +0000 (UTC)
bolshoyhuy@hotmail.com wrote:
> "looptest 1000000000
> Time to do 1000000000 iterations: 0.000000 seconds.
>
> $ looptest 4294967295
> Time to do 4294967295 iterations: 0.000000 seconds.
>
> Pretty much what I expected."
>
> how is it possible to have 0.00 secs for your loops when every else
> gets 2,3,5 secs for 10m?
C's really fast.
> something aint kosher here.
Right. But I did indeed get the results I posted, using the code
I posted.
- Next message: Thomas Matthews: "Re: Areas of Programming..."
- Previous message: bolshoyhuy_at_hotmail.com: "Re: loop test"
- In reply to: bolshoyhuy_at_hotmail.com: "Re: loop test"
- Next in thread: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: loop test"
- Reply: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: loop test"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]