Re: Visual SourceSafe considered harmful
From: Phlip (phlip2005_at_gmail.com)
Date: 02/23/05
- Next message: mbitten73_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Introsort"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Visual SourceSafe considered harmful"
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: Visual SourceSafe considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: Visual SourceSafe considered harmful"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: Visual SourceSafe considered harmful"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 22 Feb 2005 16:29:03 -0800
Duane Arnold wrote:
> Yeah, well I sat down at the command line 30 years ago . I didn't
like it
> then and I had no choice. I still don't like it and I do have a
choice. I
> would much rather point and click any time, any where, and any
place. I am
> still a programmer all day long. However, if I have to go to the
command
> line, I'll do that too. But in the meantime, I'll avoid the command
line.
> I thought I had heard everything ;-)
GUIs are for civilians. They are like training wheels. Engineers take
them off and ride.
For example, when I automate a build script, it...
- pulls in all changed files
- builds any outputs whose dependencies changed
- runs all the tests
- publishes the results via e-mail and web.
That is the nucleus of a daily build system. On a big project, it can
take hours. So, which parts would you like to keep manual, and which
parts would you like to automate, to run unattended?
-- Phlip
- Next message: mbitten73_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Introsort"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Visual SourceSafe considered harmful"
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: Visual SourceSafe considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: Visual SourceSafe considered harmful"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: Visual SourceSafe considered harmful"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|