Re: WSJ article on software liability
From: Randy Howard (randyhoward_at_FOOverizonBAR.net)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Randy Howard: "Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language"
- Previous message: Randall Hyde: "Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language"
- In reply to: CTips: "Re: WSJ article on software liability"
- Next in thread: CTips: "Re: WSJ article on software liability"
- Reply: CTips: "Re: WSJ article on software liability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:08:30 GMT
In article <112280ionbgv0f5@corp.supernews.com>, ctips@bestweb.net
says...
> Traveler wrote:
> A quote from your site
> (http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm):
> "hardware faults are mostly physical faults, while software faults are
> design faults, which are harder to visualize, classify, detect, and
> correct."
>
> Bull***.
Uh oh. After how he reacted to relatively mild comments, this
and what follows it should cause a meltdown. I agree with you
btw. :-)
-- Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR) "Making it hard to do stupid things often makes it hard to do smart ones too." -- Andrew Koenig
- Next message: Randy Howard: "Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language"
- Previous message: Randall Hyde: "Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language"
- In reply to: CTips: "Re: WSJ article on software liability"
- Next in thread: CTips: "Re: WSJ article on software liability"
- Reply: CTips: "Re: WSJ article on software liability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]