Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language
From: Phil Carmody (thefatphil_demunge_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Dave Rusin: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Previous message: BCC: "Object initialization and xml question"
- In reply to: Randy Howard: "Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language"
- Next in thread: Randy Howard: "Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language"
- Reply: Randy Howard: "Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:58:16 +0200
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:55:28 +0000, Randy Howard wrote:
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| C++ programmers on the other hand, think that invoking 1600 |
| constructors per second is a wet dream. |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
Worth framing.
Of course nowadays the money shot in the wet dream is is only
_invoking_ 1 constructor with the knowledge that 1599 more would
happen invisibly in the background as a side-effect.
And that's coming from someone who lectured C++ at university level
back when CFront2 was cool, and CFront3 was hot.
Phil
- Next message: Dave Rusin: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Previous message: BCC: "Object initialization and xml question"
- In reply to: Randy Howard: "Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language"
- Next in thread: Randy Howard: "Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language"
- Reply: Randy Howard: "Re: Intro to Programming w/ Machine Language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]