Re: X-No-archive considered harmful
From: Jan Panteltje (pNaonStaemltje_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: CBFalconer: "Re: Variation of bit-counting"
- Previous message: gswork_at_mailcity.com: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- In reply to: gswork_at_mailcity.com: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Rene Moehring: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- Reply: Rene Moehring: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:29:12 GMT
On a sunny day (3 Mar 2005 07:06:42 -0800) it happened gswork@mailcity.com
wrote in <1109862402.892946.315550@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
i like google's
>usenet facility because you can search the archive & 'log on' at any
>webbrowser. however, it's worrying to imagine a time in the future
>when this great archive might be locked off by making it pay to view.
>hope that never happens.
If they make it PPV then they will have to pay me royalties.
ALL text remains copyright.
Whether explicitely stated or not.
Out of context quoting, altered display, and changing of header lines is
explicitely forbidden, as is falsifying the origin / author / date/ destination /
and references lines.
I have:
Searched all groups Results 1 - 10 of 13,400 for panteltje (0.33 seconds)
By publishing this, Google (Deja news) agrees all postings made by
Jan Panteltje are protected by copyright, and that in case google or
any of its devisions, companies, or representatives asks money to access these
postings in its archive, Jan Panteltje will be payed 25 Euro cent for every
access to this work.
Now what.
I can put my own archive on line too in a minute or 2.
Let's see what happens now (nothing).
- Next message: CBFalconer: "Re: Variation of bit-counting"
- Previous message: gswork_at_mailcity.com: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- In reply to: gswork_at_mailcity.com: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Rene Moehring: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- Reply: Rene Moehring: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
