Re: X-No-archive considered harmful
From: Rene Moehring (rene_moehring_at_gmx.de)
Date: 03/04/05
- Next message: rik: "Re: The code of co-workers"
- Previous message: s_subbarayan_at_rediffmail.com: "Re: collating (mixing) two linked lists using C- and problem with linked lists!"
- In reply to: Jan Panteltje: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- Next in thread: TGOS: "Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 4 Mar 2005 09:00:26 GMT
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:29:12 GMT, Jan Panteltje wrote:
> On a sunny day (3 Mar 2005 07:06:42 -0800) it happened gswork@mailcity.com
> wrote in <1109862402.892946.315550@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
> i like google's
>>usenet facility because you can search the archive & 'log on' at any
>>webbrowser. however, it's worrying to imagine a time in the future
>>when this great archive might be locked off by making it pay to view.
>>hope that never happens.
> If they make it PPV then they will have to pay me royalties.
> ALL text remains copyright.
No, or do you get royalties from news providers?
-- I'm not a racist. I hate everyone equally!
- Next message: rik: "Re: The code of co-workers"
- Previous message: s_subbarayan_at_rediffmail.com: "Re: collating (mixing) two linked lists using C- and problem with linked lists!"
- In reply to: Jan Panteltje: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- Next in thread: TGOS: "Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
