Re: Turing machines, quantum computers, and alephs
stephen_at_nomail.com
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: Bitbucket: "Re: Career change. Am I smoking crack?"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Career change. Am I smoking crack?"
- In reply to: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Turing machines, quantum computers, and alephs"
- Next in thread: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Turing machines, quantum computers, and alephs"
- Reply: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Turing machines, quantum computers, and alephs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 22 Mar 2005 23:31:48 GMT
In sci.math Gerry Quinn <gerryq@deletethisindigo.ie> wrote:
: In article <1111453497.964842.107290@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
: hack@watson.ibm.com says...
:> If an infinite initial marking is allowed, the machine becomes strictly
:> more powerful (rises in the Turing-degree hierarchy). For example, one
:> could solve the Halting Problem for all ordinary Turing machines by
:> table lookup!
: Interesting perspective, but not what we're talking about here. And I
: don't believe it is correct, anyway, because of EXACTLY the same error
: that I believe I have uncovered, and which provoked this thread.
: If you have marked up the solution to the halting problem for all Turing
: machines up to a certain finite descriptor size, your tape is finite,
: and its length is an exponential function of the descriptor size. But
: if you let the descriptor size rize to infinity (Aleph-0), as you must
: if you are to cater for "all ordinary Turing machines", then the length
: needed for the marked tape must rise to the order of 2^(Aleph-0) or
: Aleph-1. And Aleph-1 marks won't fit on a tape, even an infinite one,
: because it only has room for Aleph-0 symbols.
You are incorrect. There are Aleph-0 Turing machines, and Aleph-0
finite inputs. So the number of pairs of machines and inputs is
Aleph-0*Aleph-0=Aleph-0. A tape with room for Aleph-0 symbols has
room for the answer to the halting problem for all possible machines
and inputs.
Stephen
- Next message: Bitbucket: "Re: Career change. Am I smoking crack?"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Career change. Am I smoking crack?"
- In reply to: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Turing machines, quantum computers, and alephs"
- Next in thread: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Turing machines, quantum computers, and alephs"
- Reply: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Turing machines, quantum computers, and alephs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|