Re: What's all this fuss about Object-Oriented languages, please?

From: Programmer Dude (Chris_at_Sonnack.com)
Date: 03/29/05 

Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:30:40 -0600

gswork@mailcity.com writes:

> Ideally no one would give you any pointers! that's part of the point
> of OOP, to have less dependancy on pointers as a means of referring to
> things.

I'm thinking Bjarne Stroustrup didn't get that memo... :-\

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Nodes with unlimited children.
    ... > Re: Memory faults, ... > I'm no longer using the code you were referring to. ... > Now I only allocate dynamic arrays of pointers, ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: getch() and c++
    ... >> pointers to FAQs etc? ... > seems worth making a point about). ... I was referring to the variable names, and no, it's not really ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: Paul Graham explains Ruby symbols
    ... > referring to some values? ... Seems like a nice way for using pointers ... But we feel we are confused on a higher level and about more important things. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: Flexfile Memos
    ... account has that account number imbedded in it)? ... rebuild the pointers by writing the text back to the MEMO field. ...
    (comp.lang.clipper)
  • Re: Intensity Stereo Coding
    ... > Any pointers on exactly how this works? ... The Google ... > stuff seemed a little hazy. ... > I'm referring to the mode of Joint Stereo coding ...
    (comp.dsp)