Re: Which language should I learn?



Jam Pa wrote:

> I am considering learning a programming language.
>
> I'm not a 'programmer' or a computer scientist but an artist, but I do
have
> good understanding of java and php, of several different programming
> methodologies like OOP, of server-client programming, simple UI
> programming, usability factors, etcetc..
>
> Which language I should learn?

The regulars here know my answer, and I was going to let them reply, but you
mentioned art.

Dig in:

http://flea.sourceforge.net/

> My wish list:
> * The language should be available for both Windows and GNU/Linux.

Check.

> * The language should be advanced enough to build complex programs for GUI
> apps, graphical visualization and what not (ie. not only a scripting
> language).

Check. From Tk to OpenGL.

> * The language should have a ready set of XML tools for parsing XML files,
> preferably manipulating DOM trees.

Absolutely. REXML is bundled with the distribution, and it puts all the Perl
XML library to shame.

> * The language should have a future - learning a new language takes time
> for me and I dont want that time to be wasted after only few years.

Check. A huge, growing user community, including many of the Smalltalk gurus
who invented things like Design Patterns and XP.

> * The language should be as easy and take care of as many things for me as
> possible (like garbage collection, automated memory handling..)
> I have initially looked into Python and Ruby.

I have been describing Ruby. (Python has a longer head start but a poorer
technology base.)

What didn't you like about Ruby?

--
Phlip
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?ZeekLand


.



Relevant Pages

  • RE: C# book for 16 yo?
    ... First I would suggest first learning Visual Studio.NET. ... Then I suggest 2 books to actually learn C# - Microsoft has a book called ... important to quality programming. ... language that combines all the best features of previous languages and is ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Lisp Ruby Scheme
    ... :> pure functional programming in Haskell and learning it in Scheme ... prototypical language to incorporate it, so if I wanted to really grok ... I would find me a compiler for Eiffel and start feeding it ...
    (comp.lang.scheme)
  • Re: Opinions on intro lisp books
    ... But Lisp is a little different, ... Some languages support one style of programming better than they ... Even if that weren't the case, I'm not sure that a language being a ... I don't believe that learning to program in CL requires more theory ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Ruby as First Language
    ... } My order was Quick BASIC, then C++, PHP, then Ruby. ... Most forms of Basic are, indeed, impediments to learning to ... I learned AppleSoft BASIC as my first language. ... } the basics of C or C++ in parallel with Ruby. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: Newbie (Followup)
    ... level language (as I believe I will end up learning more). ... know a little bit including the basics of pointers, ... Alas I am forced to learn a "language" that deviates from even the most basic principles of programming (from what I have seen so far/ ...
    (comp.lang.c)