Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- From: "Phlip" <phlip_cpp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:33:21 GMT
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
> > I think Phlip is exagerating the complexity of a Windows SDK program
(pure
> > C).
>
> No, not really. However, I think he's exaggerating the benefits from
using
> an OO language. Those benefits are there 100% if you write a program that
> is not Windows-specific, but in that case you're not writing a Windows
> application; the Windows-specific stuff requires dealing with things that
> object oriented abstraction doesn't make simple, although it helps much.
? I think I said that a well-designed wrapper system, working with its host
language and not against it, will get you coding useful windows much faster
than hours of low-level mucking. OO is orthogonal.
> > For SDK programming you could start with Programming Windows by Charles
> > Petzold.
>
> Good advice.
Why not start in assembler?
The OP thinks that learning OO will be hard, and required for windows. OO
will make a wrapper library easy to learn for windows.
--
Phlip
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?ZeekLand
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- From: Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- References:
- Windows Procedural Programming
- From: Snooze
- Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- From: Joe Butler
- Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- From: Alf P. Steinbach
- Windows Procedural Programming
- Prev by Date: Re: Serializing a trie (sorting problem)
- Next by Date: Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- Next by thread: Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|