Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- From: "Phlip" <phlip_cpp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:21:05 GMT
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
> So I think the question really is, why recommend a book based on C?
>
> Because it's the best book there is on the GUI side of the Windows API.
The
> use of C in the book is in a sense good because the details are exposed,
> which is what you need for understanding. It is however the opposite of
> what you want in real applications, where the details just complicate.
>
>
> > The OP thinks that learning OO will be hard, and required for windows.
OO
> > will make a wrapper library easy to learn for windows.
>
> Yep.
To avoid "learning" OO, the OP should also avoid the low-level "C style"
stuff that simulates OO without direct language support. That's even worse!
--
Phlip
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?ZeekLand
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- From: Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- References:
- Windows Procedural Programming
- From: Snooze
- Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- From: Joe Butler
- Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- From: Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- From: Alf P. Steinbach
- Windows Procedural Programming
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- Next by Date: Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- Next by thread: Re: Windows Procedural Programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|