Re: Why not unions
- From: Vesa Karvonen <vesa.karvonen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jul 2005 00:51:33 GMT
Scott Moore <samiamsansspam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
> > Many more modern languages (like OCaml and SML) provide safe alternatives to
> > union called variant types.
> As do older languages, such as Pascal.
According to
http://www.levenez.com/lang/history.html
ML is actually only ~3 years younger than Pascal. Of course, ML didn't
originally have variant types nor pattern matching.
-Vesa Karvonen
.
- References:
- Why not unions
- From: Shwetabh
- Re: Why not unions
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Why not unions
- From: Scott Moore
- Why not unions
- Prev by Date: Re: java error
- Next by Date: Re: Suggestions for double-hashing scheme
- Previous by thread: Re: Why not unions
- Next by thread: Re: Why not unions
- Index(es):