Re: Parser generators for a simple language form. How?
- From: "Alex Fraser" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 18:43:19 +0100
"Jon Harrop" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42f1f90f$0$3489$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Alex Fraser wrote:
> > "Jon Ripley" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:8jSHe.70610$dN6.21997@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Alex Fraser wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> > Which language are the parsers currently implemented in? Are they
> >> > "hand coded" or did you use a parser generator?
> >>
> >> The parsers are currently implemented in 100% hand coded BBC BASIC.
> >
> > Have you considered converting them directly to C?
>
> I really wouldn't recommend that. At _least_ use a language with GC and
> native strings.
A language with native strings would help to some extent - that's part of
why I suggested C++ as an alternative to C in the bit you have snipped.
However, I don't think GC would be of any benefit whatsoever when converting
code from BBC BASIC. (Writing a parser from scratch is a different matter.)
Alex
.
- References:
- Parser generators for a simple language form. How?
- From: Jon Ripley
- Re: Parser generators for a simple language form. How?
- From: Alex Fraser
- Re: Parser generators for a simple language form. How?
- From: Jon Ripley
- Re: Parser generators for a simple language form. How?
- From: Alex Fraser
- Re: Parser generators for a simple language form. How?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Parser generators for a simple language form. How?
- Prev by Date: Re: Determining Syllables
- Next by Date: Re: Determining Syllables
- Previous by thread: Re: Parser generators for a simple language form. How?
- Next by thread: Re: Parser generators for a simple language form. How?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|