Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Chris Sonnack <Chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:45:32 -0500
David Golden writes:
> The slavery example shows that what is considered property by the
> lawyers can change, anyway.
A bad example, I think, due to the implication that it was just a
matter of law that allowed and now prohibits slavery. The presumption
is that, all things being equal, the law could change back again.
I do not believe all things ARE equal. We realized that we were WRONG
about slavery and corrected that wrong. Actually, we always pretty
much knew it was wrong--the error was in trying to pretend that the
folks we stole from Africa were not really people, but some form of
two-legged, articulate cattle.
I VERY much doubt that the laws that have evolved to protect the
efforts of the author/musicial/programmer/architect will ever be
viewed as immoral.
--
|_ CJSonnack <Chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> _____________| How's my programming? |
|_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL |
|_____________________________________________|_______________________|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Serge Skorokhodov (216716244)
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- References:
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Scott Moore
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: David Golden
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Scott Moore
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: David Golden
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Prev by Date: Re: Visual Basic 6.0
- Next by Date: Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Previous by thread: Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Next by thread: Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|