Re: Storing 20 million randomly accessible documents in compressed form
- From: Jon Harrop <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 04:12:04 +0100
M.Barren@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I will give the BIG zip file a try to see if it compares anywhere near
> 200 MB (because I will have another 30 to 40 Million documents on the
> way). I might be expecting magic from compression technologies but I
> just want to make sure I will save as much space as I can since there's
> a little bit of competition to it as well.
If you're compressing small files then zip/gzip is fine. For larger files
(larger than bzip's block size), bzip is likely to be substantially better.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com
.
- References:
- Storing 20 million randomly accessible documents in compressed form
- From: M . Barren
- Re: Storing 20 million randomly accessible documents in compressed form
- From: [Jongware]
- Re: Storing 20 million randomly accessible documents in compressed form
- From: Thad Smith
- Re: Storing 20 million randomly accessible documents in compressed form
- From: M . Barren
- Storing 20 million randomly accessible documents in compressed form
- Prev by Date: Re: Personal connections
- Next by Date: Re: i need help
- Previous by thread: Re: Storing 20 million randomly accessible documents in compressed form
- Next by thread: Re: Storing 20 million randomly accessible documents in compressed form
- Index(es):