Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)




"Willem" <willem@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrndje1f8.2o03.willem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Joe wrote:
> )
> ) <snippity-snip>
> )
> ) "MSCHAEF.COM" <mschaef@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> ) news:tqadnefklo61aKveRVn-hg@xxxxxxxxx
> )> Closed source restricts you to making possibly impotent petitions for
> )> help from someone else.
> )
> ) Perhaps. But this is not the only factor to consider.
>
> Then please! Enlighten us!
>
> What does Close-Source Software have that Open-Source Software does not ?
>
> You can bash the benefits of OSS-over-CSS all you want, but that
> doesn't change the fact that you have yet to mention a single benefit
> of CSS-over-OSS. And without that, you simply have no case.

Experience of using both open source and closed source software leads me to
this conclusion.

Having experienced Linux desktops, I'll stick with Windows anytime. Having
experienced Linux servers (I'll use them, but I'd probably try out Windows
alternertives next time). Havnig attempted to find information on problems
in open source and closed source systems - I'm more likely to find a fix on
the Internet for closed source systems. There are loads of reasons.
Overall, the closed nature and the initial cost associated with closed
source are generally small in comparision with the tedious issues that need
to be resolved with typical open source efforts. There are some open source
apps that I use in preference to closed source (e.g. Firefox browser) - but
I don't use it because it's open source (I only download the binary - I have
no interest in the source code). As soon as Windows Vistar (aka Longhorn)
is released, I'll be looking at IE7 and Office 12 (Office 12 blows the pants
off of open office).



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: What so special about PostgreSQL and other RDBMS?
    ... > Free, loaded with features, not particularly fast, some extras ... choice between closed and open source really means, ... backer, and with closed source, you can only chose the copyright ... Since you have no source code, no one knows but Microsoft (and the ...
    (comp.lang.php)
  • Re: [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microso
    ... I did a presentation on open vs. closed source security at ... the Open Source Security Summit. ... My theory is that since format string bugs and symlinks were found ... this notion is to look at PROTOS-style vulnerability testing suites ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Qns on linux security frm windows users :::Help !!!
    ... But can anyone help me with some qns which windows users asked me...??? ... If you are getting your versions of Open Source software ... The alternate case is that some programmer makes Bar Deluxe as a closed ... a closed source software project is likely to have sloppy ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Whats the story with the "end of XP"?
    ... one case it was being actively promoted by the FOSS Devotees over the commercial SW simply because it was FOSS for all the usual reasons... ... There are times when being open source is an absolute requirement, and poor open source software is then infinitely better than wonderful closed source software. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Whats the story with the "end of XP"?
    ... You can't call yourself an expert in cryptography without a solid familiarity with some of the most used algorithms and implementations - programs like GPG, OpenSSH and OpenSSL are known to be among the most secure solutions precisely because there are so many interested and capable people who have studied their source code. ... There is overwhelming statistical evidence that serious flaws in major open source software projects are fixed quickly - generally far faster than in comparable closed source projects. ... And there are people who feel that anyone can use whatever license they want, but that they personally will only use FOSS. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)