Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)

>
> Can you agree that Open Source, in itself, is a good thing ?

If anyone can use it in any way they see fit, without restriction, then I'd
say it wasn't a bad thing. I'm speaking here from the point of view of a
programmer that might incorporate unrestricted source and sell a resulting
product - no need to put up a load of acknowledments, etc. No worries about
being sued by some prat that's given the source away but decides that they
didn't want me to modify it and then sell it.

If someone purchases a product and gets the source code with it to do with
it what they want without re-distributing it, I wouldn't risk it for a
mass-market situation. I might risk it for high-end product that had tight
controls. This is because it's not necessarily a great advantage to the
majority of users that they get the source. In fact, in that situation, it
may become a bit of a problem, since you could end up with an inexperienced
programmer moding the code on behalf of a company and causing all sorts of
issues. Then you have the problem that the vendor of the product getting
blamed for instability, loss of data, etc. I guess that's one reason not to
give customers the source code - to protect yourself from problems caused by
the customer.

>
> In my personal opinion (roughly speaking):
> GPL is to Open Source what Communism is to Marxism.

I'll take your word on that - I didn't study politics.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: PCB CAD
    ... Has anyone ever used emacs to write source code to tape out a chip, ... touching an open source tool along the way? ... group of "mission critical" customers gave them 1.4 billion last year. ... > commercial product out the door...... ...
    (sci.electronics.cad)
  • Re: Whats the story with the "end of XP"?
    ... You can't call yourself an expert in cryptography without a solid familiarity with some of the most used algorithms and implementations - programs like GPG, OpenSSH and OpenSSL are known to be among the most secure solutions precisely because there are so many interested and capable people who have studied their source code. ... There is overwhelming statistical evidence that serious flaws in major open source software projects are fixed quickly - generally far faster than in comparable closed source projects. ... And there are people who feel that anyone can use whatever license they want, but that they personally will only use FOSS. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • FLOSS for e-learning
    ... participants as documentation on the issues and concerns related to the ... Free and Open Source Software for e-learning ... Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) has become an international ... Access to the source code is a precondition for this; ...
    (comp.os.linux.announce)
  • Re: PHP Classes suggestions (was Re: Recommendations for PHP Form Validation Script)
    ... > particular format is going to add anything meaningful. ... > dependency tree system with multiple possible package branches. ... > Well, this can happen to anyone, whether your project/service is open source ... so I will not Open the Source code of the site. ...
    (comp.lang.php)
  • Re: I was told that "I dont understand how Open Source works."
    ... Proper support from somebody who knows the product is as vital ... > under Open Source as anywhere else. ... and use that source code to create what they need, ... also means that releasing the source code is easier for the author ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)