Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: "William" <Reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:28:53 -0500
"Antoon Pardon" <apardon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrndjfi1q.2ko.apardon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Op 2005-09-23, William schreef <Reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > History - there for anyone to read and interpret.
>
> You show no evidence. You only assert there is evidence.
> So I find your statement that I prefer my belief system
> over the evidence at least premature.
Since we both have equal access to the available evidence,
but only one of us has asserted that they've studied it,
I kind of think you do prefer your belief system. By your
own assertion, anything I feed you will be biased, but you
don't seem inclined to do any looking on your own.
You made the original assertion, it's been challenged,
your turn. Were I in your position, I'd have hopped over
to Google and checked out a few high profile inventors
and/or inventions and come up with a little support.
Here're some starters:
John Harrison (chronometer)
George Westinghouse (hundreds, but most of his early
work was railroad-related)
Joseph Jacquard (loom)
Samuel Colt (revolver)
Elias Howe (sewing machine)
I would argue that most of these people were responding
to market opportunities with profits in mind. (Harrison
was responding to a prize offer, but a large market for
timepieces was obvious as well.)
But just refuting these won't support your argument very
well, you need to find evidence of a trend; something
suggesting a majority were not profit motivated to begin
their work.
BTW, I didn't bother mentioning Edison - too obvious.
> Well but until I actually studied this evidence and form
> a valid opinion, you can't expect me to be convinced, can
> you?
I don't actually expect you to be convinced. -Wm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Antoon Pardon
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- References:
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: David Golden
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: David Golden
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: David Golden
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Chris Sonnack
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: David Golden
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Joe Butler
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Antoon Pardon
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: William
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Antoon Pardon
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: William
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Antoon Pardon
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: William
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Antoon Pardon
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: William
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Prev by Date: Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Next by Date: Re: New tutorials site. Help wanted.
- Previous by thread: Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Next by thread: Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|