Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Chris Sonnack <Chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:16:14 -0500
Willem writes:
> Well then, could you make a case why closed source is better in the bigger
> picture ?
>
> Besides the fact that 'locking in' your buyers is good for a vendor ?
Partnerships--despite (or perhaps BECAUSE OF) any "locking in"--can be
beneficial to both parties.
Marriage is, in part, based on this premise. So are many other forms
of partnership. It's beneficial to both parties, despite the downsides.
--
|_ CJSonnack <Chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> _____________| How's my programming? |
|_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL |
|_____________________________________________|_______________________|
.
- References:
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Joe Butler
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: MSCHAEF.COM
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Joe Butler
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: MSCHAEF.COM
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Joe Butler
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Joe Butler
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Willem
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Joe Butler
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- From: Willem
- Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Prev by Date: Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Next by Date: Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Previous by thread: Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Next by thread: Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|