Re: programming with large memory requirements
- From: Ben Pfaff <blp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:59:06 -0700
Randy Howard <randyhoward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Ben Pfaff wrote
> (in article <87oe6d9re5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>):
>
>> or concatenate multiple 1 GB ram disks using a raid
>> driver. Either one would allow the effect of a 9 GB ram disk.
>
> Actually, this one is likely to have some measurable overhead,
> if it does work. At the end of the day, no great answer is
> available on 32-bit boxes.
It's certainly true that the best choice would be to spend $300
for an AMD64 box.
--
"I admire him, I frankly confess it; and when his time comes
I shall buy a piece of the rope for a keepsake."
--Mark Twain
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: programming with large memory requirements
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: programming with large memory requirements
- References:
- programming with large memory requirements
- From: KRK
- Re: programming with large memory requirements
- From: Martin Eisenberg
- Re: programming with large memory requirements
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: programming with large memory requirements
- From: Ben Pfaff
- Re: programming with large memory requirements
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: programming with large memory requirements
- From: Ben Pfaff
- Re: programming with large memory requirements
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: programming with large memory requirements
- From: Ben Pfaff
- Re: programming with large memory requirements
- From: Randy Howard
- programming with large memory requirements
- Prev by Date: Re: virtual addresses
- Next by Date: Re: subset function for string in c++
- Previous by thread: Re: programming with large memory requirements
- Next by thread: Re: programming with large memory requirements
- Index(es):