Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- From: Gerry Quinn <gerryq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 11:23:39 -0000
In article <z1Y8f.34$ev.27@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dave@xxxxxxxxx
says...
> Whoever said programming is a low stress hobby/career has
> obviously never attempted to programm in ASM. For months I was
> debating whether or not I should learn ASM, and for some stupid
> reason, I decided to breakdown and buy a few books about it.
> It's been about 3 months since then, and I've never been so
> stressed out in my entire life trying to learn it. It's just too
> difficult. I have a strong background in C and C++, so I thought
> I'd pick up ASM quickly. Boy, was I ever wrong.
>
> I have a deep respect for all of you ASM programmers out there.
> I really do. I'm glad you had the patience to learn it...
Depends on the processor. Processors with more complex instruction
sets and lots of on-board registers are easier than those with fewer
instructions and registers. Supposedly Intel 80x80 ASM is harder than
most.
- Gerry Quinn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- From: Alex Fraser
- Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- References:
- Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- From: Dave
- Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- Prev by Date: Re: Where to get (buy?) smilies for my application.
- Next by Date: Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- Previous by thread: Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- Next by thread: Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|