Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- From: Gerry Quinn <gerryq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:12:28 -0000
In article <ToKdnSmX9Lv2X_nenZ2dnUVZ8qKdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
me@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
> "Gerry Quinn" <gerryq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1dcebd98896bdf2a98a6fc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Depends on the processor. Processors with more complex instruction
> > sets and lots of on-board registers are easier than those with fewer
> > instructions and registers.
>
> I find simpler instruction sets (older, eg 8051, or RISC) far easier and I
> suspect most people would agree with me.
I don't see why a limited instruction set would be easier to use than a
more comprehensive one.
- Gerry Quinn
.
- References:
- Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- From: Dave
- Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- From: Alex Fraser
- Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- Prev by Date: Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- Next by Date: Re: interval intersection
- Previous by thread: Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- Next by thread: Re: Programming: Not stressful? Yeah, right...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|