Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Richard Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:07:17 +0000 (UTC)
spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx said:
> Seriously, let's see. Richard Heathfield goes for C++ builder, and
> programming for Windows but bypassing .Net.
>
> Right? Right. Right?
Wrong in the context of the original question, which invited a choice
between C++.net and VB.net. Those were the only choices, and there isn't
all that much to choose between them - and that's what I said in my
original answer: "Pick the one whose syntax your team is most comfortable
with".
> I suppose it's possible to program decent applications in C++ Builder.
Yes, it is.
> Let's see, those would be COM applications, wouldn't they,
Some would. Others wouldn't.
> and you will
> have to trust a small shop in Redmond NOT to change the rules.
If you're worried about that, pick a more stable OS.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Duane Arnold
- Re: VB or VC++?
- References:
- VB or VC++?
- From: iftg
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Duane Arnolder
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Duane Arnold
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Duane Arnold
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Joe Wright
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Duane Arnold
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Ben Pfaff
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: Duane Arnold
- Re: VB or VC++?
- From: spinoza1111
- VB or VC++?
- Prev by Date: [vc6] Problem with resource editor
- Next by Date: Re: VB or VC++?
- Previous by thread: Re: VB or VC++?
- Next by thread: Re: VB or VC++?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|