Re: Binqry Tree sort
- From: nejla.ghaboosi@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 16 Jan 2006 00:01:10 -0800
To Willem:
> Mergesort or quicksort won't work because they have a sequential stage
> that is O(n) and unparallelizable.
They are parallelizable. I read about their parallel implementation.
> Ah okay. Not sure if that makes much difference, just that you have to
> choose your interconnects very carefully.
The interconnection between processors are like theconnection between a
binary tree.
> The simplest for would probably be a bit like a neural net, with several
> rows, where each is interconnected with the next, two inputs and two outputs,
> where the node simply puts the smaller to one output and the larger to the
> other. Then is is a question of how to connect the nodes together.
Maybe you are right but I am not looking for an artificial life method
like using ANNs.
In addition we have a network (Sorting network) as a parallel
architecture for just sorting elements of set and it's base structure
is ODD-EVEN NEtwork. and the procesors do a little the same as what you
mentiond. The processor elements have 2 inputs and 2 outputs. The first
output will be the smaller value and the output will be the greater
value.
But the processors which I want to use in my bianry tree architecture
all have just one output and they send it to the parent(Upward) and to
two children through connections downward.
To Logan:
> Basically, the root node is a huge bottleneck.
The root node has no bottle neck becasue it just receives data from its
2 children not more than that. And all data go from each tree level to
the next level, upward or downward, step by step & synchronously. Think
about the pipeline idea of computer architectures of Super-Scalars .
To Chuck:
> You failed to quote context, making your post rather useless. That
> is why I asked you to read my sig and the URL it points to before
> posting again. Please do so.
OK Chuck. Is it true now?
To be honest I lost my self confidence. I'm a little afraid this time
you say: you have to answer individually. :)
Anyway, please let me know if I have other mistakes.
Thanks from all
Nejla
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Binqry Tree sort
- From: Willem
- Re: Binqry Tree sort
- From: nejla . ghaboosi
- Re: Binqry Tree sort
- References:
- Binqry Tree sort
- From: nejla . ghaboosi
- Re: Binqry Tree sort
- From: Chuck F.
- Re: Binqry Tree sort
- From: nejla . ghaboosi
- Re: Binqry Tree sort
- From: Chuck F.
- Binqry Tree sort
- Prev by Date: Re: Re-using vs. Re-coding
- Next by Date: Re: Binqry Tree sort
- Previous by thread: Re: Binqry Tree sort
- Next by thread: Re: Binqry Tree sort
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|