Re: Binqry Tree sort
- From: "Chuck F. " <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:22:42 -0500
nejla.ghaboosi@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Thanks chuck for your advices. I'll obey from those rules. and second about the algorithm which I asked. Actually I'm looking for a parallel proessing, not a sequential proessing with just one processor. Assume each node of a tree as a processor. The connection between processors are like the binary tree. In other words I want to use the binary tree as my parallel architecture.
You failed to quote context, making your post rather useless. That is why I asked you to read my sig and the URL it points to before posting again. Please do so.
Sedgewicks "Algorithms in C" has a good discussion of sorting methods for parallel processing.
-- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Binqry Tree sort
- From: nejla . ghaboosi
- Re: Binqry Tree sort
- References:
- Binqry Tree sort
- From: nejla . ghaboosi
- Re: Binqry Tree sort
- From: Chuck F.
- Re: Binqry Tree sort
- From: nejla . ghaboosi
- Binqry Tree sort
- Prev by Date: Re: Re-using vs. Re-coding
- Next by Date: Re: Interesting article by Joel Spolsky: The Perils of JavaSchools
- Previous by thread: Re: Binqry Tree sort
- Next by thread: Re: Binqry Tree sort
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|