Re: priority inheritence and ceiling protocol
- From: Thad Smith <ThadSmith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:42:42 -0700
Jack Klein wrote:
>
> Priority ceiling is a newer idea than priority inheritance. Its
> proponents claim that it is more efficient. I cannot verify that
> because I have no direct experience with it myself.
[comparison of priority inheritance and priority ceiling]
Thanks for the excellent post, Jack!
> To me it seems counter
> intuitive that tasks A and B are preempted when either C or E has a
> mutex if neither of them wants it. I have not looked at any test
> results or benchmarks by proponents of priority ceiling to see what
> evidence they might have of their claims.
I agree with you that, although apparently more efficient in terms of
reduced overhead to implement, it seems to use too big of a hammer,
which can seriously subvert the priority scheme.
--
Thad
.
- References:
- priority inheritence and ceiling protocol
- From: Gowri
- Re: priority inheritence and ceiling protocol
- From: Jack Klein
- priority inheritence and ceiling protocol
- Prev by Date: Re: linux persistent c application with http protocol?
- Next by Date: Re: linux persistent c application with http protocol?
- Previous by thread: Re: priority inheritence and ceiling protocol
- Next by thread: priority inheritence and ceiling protocol
- Index(es):