Re: Languages with no reserved words?
- From: thomas.mertes@xxxxxx
- Date: 19 Feb 2006 10:27:31 -0800
randyhow...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Is that versioning info in the include file name?
Most of the language definitions (statements, operators, types, ... )
are defined in "seed7_05.s7i". This makes "seed7_05.s7i" special.
Without
it, it would not be Seed7. A different language or a new version
of Seed7 could be defined in a another include file. So it is really a
versioning info in the include file name.
You can see it this way:
The programmer informs the interpreter (or compiler) which version
of the language he is using (Currently there is just one version).
Hopefully this does not stop you to take a closer look.
Greetings Thomas Mertes
Seed7 Homepage: http://seed7.sourceforge.net
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seed7
Project page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/seed7
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Versioning info, was Re: Languages with no reserved words?
- From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
- Versioning info, was Re: Languages with no reserved words?
- References:
- Languages with no reserved words?
- From: casioculture
- Re: Languages with no reserved words?
- From: thomas . mertes
- Re: Languages with no reserved words?
- From: Randy Howard
- Languages with no reserved words?
- Prev by Date: Re: recursive descent parser
- Next by Date: Re: Recursion
- Previous by thread: Re: Languages with no reserved words?
- Next by thread: Versioning info, was Re: Languages with no reserved words?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|