Re: Assignmnet problem with rules
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:47:07 -0500
Ayende Rahien wrote:
The rules are things like: Do not assign with this other person, don't
assign over 40 hours a week, always assign at least three people for
this time, etc.
What has this to do with anything? Always include adequate context
so that your article stands by itself. There is no guarantee, nor
even likelihood, that your reader can access previous posts, or has
ever or ever will receive them. Google IS NOT usenet. It is just
a very poor broken interface to usenet, which presents a highly
distorted view. See my sig below, and the references therein, for
means of using google intelligently.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>
Also see <http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/>
.
- References:
- Assignmnet problem with rules
- From: Ayende Rahien
- Re: Assignmnet problem with rules
- From: Willem
- Re: Assignmnet problem with rules
- From: Ayende Rahien
- Assignmnet problem with rules
- Prev by Date: discrete event simulation question
- Next by Date: Re: Assignmnet problem with rules
- Previous by thread: Re: Assignmnet problem with rules
- Next by thread: Re: Assignmnet problem with rules
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|