Re: Hash Function problem
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 01:09:26 -0500
Randy Howard wrote:
.... snip ...
Question... are the "Update!" sections in forward or reverse
chronological order as they appear on the page? I'm guessing
that the Alan Mycroft derived 'xstrlen' is the fastest of the
bunch, but don't want to run a bunch of tests to reproduce what
you've done already. (Essentially, it would be nice if your
"Update!" sections were dated).
I am planning on using that routine as an example in a future c.l.c
article. It will tentatively be titled "Making fatal hidden
assumptions". So far I have spotted six such. Woops, make that 7.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>
Also see <http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hash Function problem
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: Hash Function problem
- References:
- Hash Function problem
- From: Hugo
- Re: Hash Function problem
- From: websnarf
- Re: Hash Function problem
- From: websnarf
- Re: Hash Function problem
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Hash Function problem
- From: websnarf
- Re: Hash Function problem
- From: bob_jenkins
- Re: Hash Function problem
- From: websnarf
- Re: Hash Function problem
- From: Randy Howard
- Hash Function problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Compiles without Executing
- Next by Date: Re: Finding Permutations of BST
- Previous by thread: Re: Hash Function problem
- Next by thread: Re: Hash Function problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|