Re: Cannot understand the following codes
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:34:49 -0500
gpsabove@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I was told that this was so-called "obfuscated C" style, which
was used for object-style programming from a high-level assembly
language before C++ came.
Could anybody please tell me what is the C++ equivalent form of
the above codes?
I see no "above codes". Include context. There is no reason to
ever assume a reader can see, or ever will see, any previous
messages. Thus every article needs to stand by itself. For means
of doing this on the foully broken google interface to usenet, see
my sig below, and the referenced URLs.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>
Also see <http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/>
.
- References:
- Cannot understand the following codes
- From: gpsabove
- Re: Cannot understand the following codes
- From: gpsabove
- Cannot understand the following codes
- Prev by Date: Re: Cannot understand the following codes
- Next by Date: Re: Transfer data between processes
- Previous by thread: Re: Cannot understand the following codes
- Next by thread: Lex
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|