Re: String concatenation design
- From: Ben Pfaff <blp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:49:37 -0800
"Rob Thorpe" <robert.thorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Rob Thorpe wrote:
Don't do what C, C++ and Perl do, and have 15 levels with slightly
different priorities. These languages are popular but their precendence
levels aren't.
What evidence is there to support your claim that the precedence levels
are unpopular?
The GNU style guide is milder:
"Instead, use extra parentheses so that the indentation [of
expressions] shows the nesting:"
That's not a general dictum. It's specifically in reference to
splitting a long expression into multiple lines.
--
"Now I have to go wash my mind out with soap."
--Derick Siddoway
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: String concatenation design
- References:
- String concatenation design
- From: Anton Treuenfels
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: andy
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: Rob Thorpe
- String concatenation design
- Prev by Date: Re: find a number
- Next by Date: Re: String concatenation design
- Previous by thread: Re: String concatenation design
- Next by thread: Re: String concatenation design
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|