Re: String concatenation design
- From: "Oliver Wong" <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:56:30 GMT
<andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1143732786.478212.103090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If they were changed I would be extremely annoyed because I would have
even less chance of remembering what they are. AFAIK a good subset is
the same across a wide number of languages too. That helps when
learning a new language. Hands off operator precedence! Thats what I
say.
Or just add extra parenthesis when you write your programs to make it explicit exactly what precedence levels you intended.
- Oliver
.
- References:
- String concatenation design
- From: Anton Treuenfels
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: andy
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: String concatenation design
- From: andy
- String concatenation design
- Prev by Date: ALgorithm Solution
- Next by Date: Re: String concatenation design
- Previous by thread: Re: String concatenation design
- Next by thread: Re: String concatenation design
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|