Re: returning lvalue in C vs C++



Ben C wrote:

Ah, this was the part I was missing! You did mention it before, but not
with chapter and verse from the standard.

What about f().operator=(t)? If f().x = 42 works, then it should work,
right?

--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.org/ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!!!


.