Re: Is there a comprehensible on-line reference?
- From: "Alf P. Steinbach" <alfps@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:42:52 +0200
* osmium:
Good luck on the coroutines, they are nice. But I don't know what high level, readily available, languages support them.
Modula-2 supported coroutines, so I guess Modula-2 and Oberon also do.
There is at least one coroutine library for Java, based on Java threads: restricting a thread to act like a coroutine simplifies many things.
There used to be a number of coroutine libraries for C and C++ (I made one myself), based on e.g. longjmp + a few assembly instructions.
The old Windows 16-bit API treated each "task" (instance of a program) as a coroutine, except for DOS-boxes.
Modern Windows supports co-routines directly and calls them "fibers".
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a comprehensible on-line reference?
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: Is there a comprehensible on-line reference?
- References:
- Prev by Date: A newbie help question
- Next by Date: Re: Simple Basic .NET Interview Questions May 19th, 2006
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there a comprehensible on-line reference?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a comprehensible on-line reference?
- Index(es):