Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steveo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:10:10 +0100
On 29 Jun 2006 12:09:05 +0300
Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mark Triggs writes:
ls -d */
That appears to work in Bash, even though the slash is not part of a
It also works in /bin/sh on my BSD boxes (where /bin/sh is actually
ash IIRC).
directory name. But where it works, it's overkill. This will do:
echo */
As does this.
--
C:>WIN | Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins. | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects. | licences available see
| http://www.sohara.org/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Willem
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- References:
- ls lacking a feature?
- From: Bernard Liang
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Phlip
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Bernard Liang
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Mark Triggs
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Jussi Piitulainen
- ls lacking a feature?
- Prev by Date: Re: Deleting substrings
- Next by Date: Re: Use of semaphores
- Previous by thread: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Next by thread: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|