Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Willem <willem@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:21:02 +0000 (UTC)
Richard wrote:
) The inability to list directories by some esoteric tab expansion does not
) constitute breakage, especially when I now have an lsdir command in my path
) to perform that task. (And so can anyone else who grabs that code I posted
) elsethread.)
Doesn't "echo */" or "ls */" work for you either ?
That doesn't use esoteric tab expansion...
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- References:
- ls lacking a feature?
- From: Bernard Liang
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Phlip
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Bernard Liang
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Mark Triggs
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Willem
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Roger Willcocks
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Phlip
- Re: ls lacking a feature?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- ls lacking a feature?
- Prev by Date: Re: socket programming
- Next by Date: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Previous by thread: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Next by thread: Re: ls lacking a feature?
- Index(es):